why lifting weights is better than cardio if you\'re trying to lose fat

Weight lifting is better for weight loss than cardio because broscience.
In this case, I will agree with the brothers;
Although I\'m part of the Boston Marathon qualifiers, there\'s a compelling reason why weight lifting is the best way to burn fat. Hang on;
This is complicated.
The book I recommend is \"muscle mass and metabolism\" by Nick Tuminello.
It provides a detailed description of lifting weights in a metabolic cost-effective manner.
This means that you will consume a lot of calories and increase your muscles by doing so. Awesome.
However, this is the \"build muscle\" part of the author\'s continuation of the myth.
In a great book, Nick says a pound of muscle burns an extra 30 calories a day at rest.
His source is another excellent book: M. A. X.
Muscle Plan for Brad Sean field. (
I interviewed Nick and Brad on the lifting machine;
They are the smartest two in weightlifting. )
Brad did not provide the original source for the metabolic rate of the muscles at rest.
In fact, I have never seen any scientific support for this claim.
This is fictional, not long ago I interviewed a metabolic researcher for the Los Angeles Times and looked at multiple academic sources.
The reality is that muscles burn only 6 calories a day during breaks, and if you reduce a lot of fat, you also need to say that a pound of fat burns about 2 calories per pound/day at rest.
Assuming that if you increase your muscles by 20 pounds and reduce your fat by 60 pounds, you will break even from the effect on resting metabolism.
This doesn\'t even take into account that every step you take and every step of the stairs you climb is 40 pounds lighter, which means that you consume fewer calories per day.
Heat Cost of aerobic exercise
Despite the high intensity of Tuminello\'s program, it is still not equivalent to hard aerobic exercise.
The key points of strength training and training will be \"strong\" weightlifting in six metropolitan areas (
6 times of rest metabolism).
And fast-ish run of 7.
Five miles an hour, the Heat burn at 12 points is more than twice as fast as it was. 5 METs.
For example, a 220-pound guy burns about 100 calories per hour on the sofa, Burns 600 calories per hour when he rises sharply, and runs 1,250 calories per hour at 7. 5mph.
Nick\'s project may even be higher than the 6 Mets, because he used a track that made it \"exceptionally dynamic\", but as a person who can lift weights and run, I don\'t see this intensity matching the Heat burn rate of the hard run.
Oh, don\'t mind the \"post-burn\" heat of cardio or weight lifting.
Too exaggerated.
It is worth mentioning that broscience\'s article says that aerobic games slow down your overall metabolism. Duh.
This is what any sport does.
This is the meaning of formation. Fine-
Tune your body to a higher-performance machine by weight or aerobic exercise and will not turn it into a \"fat burning blast furnace\" at rest \".
It makes it more effective, and the increased amount of muscle does not have much effect on this.
However, there is more to this story.
Through clinical studies comparing the study of 119 overweight or obese people published in the Journal of Applied Physics, they were randomly divided into three groups: individual resistance training (RT)
Separate aerobic training (AT), or both.
It is worth mentioning the nutrients, because when you add muscles, it needs to partition some of your calories.
It takes about 2,500 calories for a pound of muscle, and you need 500 calories to lose a pound of fat.
This means that for every additional pound of muscle you add, this is a food worth 2,500 calories that can enhance your muscles, and you don\'t have to worry about it from the overall energy balance equation of weight loss.
But look at these two pictures.
Even if muscle is increased, it doesn\'t seem to have much impact on those in these RT groups.
More importantly, you will stop working on your muscles in the end, so the benefits are limited.
However, it is important to recognize that . . . . . . Life is not a clinical study, but a study of sedentary and overweight/obese people that does not necessarily represent what is happening in the real world.
This study is a literal translation of AT vs heat costRT.
But the way people behave in the real world may vary, especially over time.
The study lasted eight months, but when it comes to a physical transition at the individual level, it can take years
Compared to the interaction between scientists and research volunteers, this involves long-term projects with different behavioral parameters.
So far, all of this has been ignored . . . . . . The thin body is made in the kitchen, no matter what type of exercise, burning calories is the least important thing to exercise.
I \'ve been saying this for years.
Improving exercise performance and improving health is more important, but in terms of weight loss, the ability to change eating behavior is an important benefit of regular exercise.
Exercise to increase appetite is a false myth that is either based on extreme numbers such as marathon training or because of the psychological effects of \"I exercised so I won this treatment.
\"I \'ve looked at how exercise affects my appetite in the Chicago court, and at the end of the day, intense exercise builds brain power to make better dietary decisions.
There is evidence that aerobic exercise may be better than weight lifting, but this is a clinical study, and this is the real world.
I know it takes a lot of brain power to push hard with heavy objects.
These enhanced cognitive abilities can turn you into a better eater by enhancing your plans, making decisions, and controlling the urge to eat high-calorie foods.
So, maybe aerobic exercise promotes the brain better than weight lifting controls diet, but I still stick to my original claim that iron can lose weight better.
I\'m finally going to tell you why.
One day, when riding a bicycle, the psychological rules hit me;
One suddenly realized that a lot of information was washed out in the toilet.
Human beings are unique creatures with unique motives.
I know a lot of people who like to lift weights, never do cardio and are thin.
On the contrary, I know many aerobic fans with high body fat content.
I \'ve seen hundreds of lifters who don\'t do cardio and vice versa.
Weight lifters are usually more streamlined. What gives?
This is the epiphany mentioned earlier.
Instead of scientific research, I have been observing and talking to people for 20 years, plus logic and some good guesses.
Weightlifting seems to create a mindset in which enthusiasts are more concerned about what they eat and how much they eat.
Visiting any weightlifting blog/Message Board, nutrition and fat loss are hot topics.
On the other hand, those who only do aerobic exercise seem to pay less attention to nutrition and even use it as an excuse to eat.
I did.
In order to win a drunken night, many long bike rides have been carried out.
People often do so in a social environment.
There are usually (but not always)
More emphasis on vanity.
They talk to each other.
They get nutrition advice from trainers (
Not always the best idea, but this is the idea for another article)
Sometimes, when working with a trainer, the customer feels more obligated to get results, which includes a greater focus on nutrition.
Runners, swimmers and cyclists often take part in solo activities instead of regular tutoring.
My experience in this community is that they don\'t care much about stuff being stuffed into a pie pit.
The plural of \"anecdote\" is not \"data\", but there is an observation in the absence of data: runners mostly talk about running (
Run Playlist)
Weight lifters talk more about nutrition. That\'s how you left.
View this chart (Figure A).
RT is on the left, in the middle, both on the right: Obviously, both are ways to lose weight, but it is also worth noting that in this study, both take twice as much time as RT or.
Not everyone has such time and motivation.
But what about changes in muscle mass?
We have another picture. Figure B)
: SourceWhoa, aerobic training is really bad.
They lost their muscles.
When combined with RT, it is still a bit \"killz gainz bro \".
Taking this study as an example, strict RT gained the thinnest weight.
Aerobic training has been successful so far.
But we\'re not over yet. But What to Do?
Now that you know all this, what choice should you make?
Personally I am a fan of bothrt and AT because they praise each other and in a perfect world you will give them quite equal time.
However, you can only choose one if you really have time/motivation (
Personal preference is not considered)
The logical choice is iron (
Books by Nick and Brad are good resources).
Weight lifting has an amazing effect on your physique and health, which is something else that can\'t be done because there are other ways to integrate a lot of calories
Burn cardio in daily life and do not involve running shoes, bicycles, swimming pools, Zumba classes or elliptical sneakers.
But if you choose full aerobic exercise, pay attention to nutrition care and you will feel good when you put everyone on the couch. James S.
Fell is a joint fitness columnist for The Chicago Tribune and also the right to lose it: a cruel and honest 3-
The stage program, released by the Canadian Landon House, helps you to exercise and lose weight without losing your sanity.
Visit his website. BodyForWife.
Free weight loss report.
Follow him on facebook and twitter.